The Truth Behind the Custody Legislation

 

Thanks to the repeated lies by Robert Pina, Mike Galluzzo, and Chuck Evans, there has had to be a tremendous amount of extra work to make sure that these bills move forward.  I will not allow this to happen after ten-plus years of my work to get these bills to introduction. Their insistence on using failed approaches from the past can not be followed again. 

While these three have tried to claim that they have been responsible for this legislation the record shows that they were not and that they are misrepresenting themselves and their place in what has happened here.

 

FACTS

·         The first meeting to get this legislation to move forward took place between Ray Erker and Senator Skindell.

·         Erker told Skindell that Ray Lautenschlager had proposed legislation written to replace the current custody law.

·         Ray Lautenschlager was contacted and asked to supply the language to LSC and did so in August 2010.

·         Erker and Lautenschlager met with Senator Skindell in February 2011 to finalize the introduction. A second meeting happened one month later where it was agreed that we would move forward with the language that had been agreed upon. Senator Skindell asked whom to get as a co-sponsor and was told by Ray Lautenschlager to get Senator Grendell and was handed a note to give to Grendell explaining that this was a rework of HB232. He agreed when he saw the note.

·         Ron Young was approached by Ray Lautenschlager about sponsoring.

·         Robert Pina was told to get Weddington and when he contacted him Weddington didn’t even know who he was.

·         Burke, Reese, and Yuko all called Ray Lautenschlager to talk about sponsorship. All signed on as co-sponsors.

·         Balderson, LaRose, and Eklund are on board with this after conversations with RL.

·         Galluzzo has now aligned himself with a person who is openly opposing the legislation and doesn’t even know that they are. That person has openly said they should get credit for this legislation even though they did nothing and that they oppose parts of the bill but will not identify what it is.

·         Don Hubin of Fathers and Families is opposing this legislation against the wishes of his board, a fact confirmed by several board members. Likely this is because Fathers and Families will lose their funding trail within Ohio. 

·         The replacement for Glenn Sacks is a fundraising specialist who pushes not for parental rights but for funds for them.

·         When the Gay Community of Cincinnati ran a fundraiser for Fathers and Families, no one from that organization showed up at the event.

·         Robert Pina has misrepresented himself to Parental Rights. Org and claimed that he wrote this legislation. The email trail that proves his lie has been presented to them.

 

 

Other things that you do not know:

·         All content of the website is owned by Ray Lautenschlager and was given to him when he took over PACE.

·         The use of the name was fully granted before its use by Galluzzo and Evans who have never done a thing with it not had the ability to move it forward.

·         All branding of the name and the recognition that it has is been because of the work of Ray Lautenschlager.

·         Mike and Chuck have brought no sponsors or support to the table on this. They brought nothing to the table and turned off many with their babbling. Mike Galluzzo has repeatedly said that Chuck babbles when talking on this and should never be taken to a meeting with e legislator.

·         Mike and Chuck are considered by many leaders of other groups to be a joke. In a comment to me last July, those who met to talk to me said that the joke was that Chuck was going through another divorce to try to force his constitutional argument again in the courts. 

·         The “great” Chuck Evans has repeatedly stated that he did not want to be involved in the organization. Yet now he tells all how great he is. While he may have come up with a “legal theory” that is all it is – THEORY. It has never been successfully won in any court of law.

·         The “great” Chuck Evans knows so little about this new legislation and how it works that he could not even see that it would give him full custody of his son from his current divorce. I had to explain to him how that would happen and under what procedures.

·         Mike has repeatedly chest thumped that “I am the president” and “I am managing” while doing NOTHING. SEE BELOW

·         Mike and Chuck founded NOTHING yet now they want full credit and yet now they have filed, 18 months after the fact, for a trademark of the name. And they claim that I am stealing their idea. All material was copywritten in advance of their “trademark” scheme.

·         The legislation was written by Ray Lautenschlager and Chuck added 8 words only. The rest contributed NOTHING. The need for those words is questionable at best and not critical to the outcome.

 

 

Facts that have been missed as to Galluzzo’s repeated failures:

 

·         Have the NOPEUSA domain redirected to NopeOhio and it took you several months to do a simple 5-minute task.

·         Asked you to raise funds to keep the website up and you have done NOTHING.  You question what you are told and then fail to address the issue COMPLETELY. All presentations had to be presented PROFESSIONALLY not the dime store crap- that Galluzzo has tried before and failed with.

·         I provided information on the committee and possible problems to all shortly after the bill was assigned. Then last week you asked who is on the committee.  At this rate of paying attention to you, the bill will be gone before active efforts are made for its passage.

·         I asked you to make changes within the Yahoo group because of certain troublemakers over a year ago. Done anything? I have my doubts.

·         Shall we discuss the Hubin issue which you did not address promptly?

·         To use this project as an example. You come in months AFTER I was told I was completely in charge and are failing every step of the way.

·         Also on this project, there was a time deadline set which you MISSED. You set a deadline for me which I made will time to spare and then you came back with misleading and false statements missing the deadline by hours. 

·         I ask for information that you have and tell you I need it now and it shows up days later if at all.

·         On the logo, you are again managing from BEHIND. Every time you have attempted this you have created a third-grade effort that everyone shown for opinion agrees is such. I have remained consistent in my approach and labeling and you want to change mid-plan with third-grade graphics after the name and visual recognition were established over 18 months ago. 

·         You have repeatedly failed to understand, though clearly explained, the politics of this. My statements about the effects of your statement are 100% dead on point. I have called EVERY political point on this in advance and when I say in advance I mean MONTHS, spot on and clearly to the point.