Alimony

Radford v. Radford

2011 Ohio 6263 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 8th Appellate Dist., 2011
... "(G) If any person * * * required to pay spousal support under an order made or modified by a
court on or after January 1, 1991, is found in contempt of court for failure to make alimony or
spousal support payments under the order, the court that makes the finding, in addition to ...

INKINEN-JUERGENSEN v. JUERGENSEN

2011 Ohio 5805 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 5th Appellate Dist., 2011
... {¶ 11} Holloway involved a question of alimony. However, the Ohio Supreme Court in Robrock
v. Robrock (1958), 167 Ohio St. ... {¶ 12} "`A decree granting divorce and awarding alimony is an
order of court in the enforcement of which the public has a vital interest. ...

Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire

2011 Ohio 5578 - Ohio: Supreme Court, 2011
... v. Harris, 96 Ohio St.3d 138, 2002-Ohio-2988, 772 NE2d 621, ¶ 2-3, 6, we indefinitely suspended
an attorney who had received at least $29,760.64 in alimony for a client who had been adjudicated
incompetent, and he had exhausted all but $742.54 of those funds on his own ...

SUTMOLLER v. SUTMOLLER

2011 Ohio 5450 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 12th Appellate Dist., 2011
... at 399-400. {¶10} In Kunkle v. Kunkle, 51 Ohio St.3d at 71, the Supreme Court held that "absent
an agreement between payor and payee spouses, it is improper to include in an award of
sustenance alimony a clause requiring the payor to pay alimony based on a fixed ...

Harper v. Harper

2011 Ohio 5276 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 8th Appellate Dist., 2011
... "(E) If a continuing order for periodic payments of money as alimony is entered in a divorce or
dissolution of ... Id. at syllabus. In Knapp, the former husband's financial condition had diminished
and he was unable to afford the alimony payments upon which the parties had agreed. ...

Oyler v. Oyler

2011 Ohio 4390 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 5th Appellate Dist., 2011
... 3d 142, 541 NE2d 1028. The Supreme Court made the abuse of discretion standard
applicable to alimony orders in Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 217, 450
NE2d 1140; to property divisions in Martin v. Martin (1985), 18 Ohio St. ...

Gray v. Gray

2011 Ohio 4091 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 8th Appellate Dist., 2011
... abuse of discretion standard. Booth v. Booth (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 142, 144, 541
NE2d 1028. This same standard is used in reviewing orders relating to alimony and
a division of marital property. Id., citing Blakemore v. Blakemore ...

FERRITTO v. KRIHWAN

2011 Ohio 4017 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 11th Appellate Dist., 2011
... settlement between the parties. *** For purposes of enforcement, both the alimony and
property settlement provisions of the decree are orders of the court, and represent more
than a debt of one spouse to the other." Id. {¶23} To begin ...

Burke v. Burke

2011 Ohio 3723 - Ohio: Court of Appeals, 2nd Appellate Dist., 2011
... "In allocating property between the parties to a divorce and in making an award of sustenance
alimony, the trial court must indicate the basis for its award in sufficient detail to enable a reviewing
court to determine that the award is fair, equitable, and in accordance with the law ...