Firefoxhttps://outlook.live.com/mail/0/AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04MDg...
O
utlook
Fwd: Re: Siblings Rights Bill Draft
Fromlegislation
@
ohiofamilyrights
.
com
<
legislation
@
ohiofamilyrights
.
com
>
Date
S
un
8
/
1
7/2
0
25
8
:
3
0
PM
To ma
5
hie
@
hotmail
.
com
<
ma
5
hie
@
hotmail
.
com
>
3
attachments
(455 K
B
)
F
amily
I
nvolvement
A
ct
.
pdf
; G
uardinship
B
ill
.
docx
;
S
ibling
R
ights
.
pdf
;
--------
O
riginal
M
essage
--------
S
ubject
:
R
e
:
S
iblings
R
ights
B
ill
D
raft
D
ate
:
2
0
2
5-
0
8
-
1
7
1
3
:
0
3
F
rom
:
R
ay
L
autenschlager
<
ma
5
hie
@
hotmail
.
com
>
T
o
: L
uiza
M
c
Q
ueen
<
luizamcqueen
@
gmail
.
com
>, "M
c
C
arthy
, J
ordan
"
<
jordan
.
mccarthy
@
ohiohouse
.
gov
>
L
uiza
sent
a
copy
of
what
L
S
C
came
up
with
on
the
S
ibling
R
ights
bill
.
I
am
puzzled
here
.
You
saw
the
questions
they
asked
me
and
you
saw
my
answers
.
What
in
my
answers
was
not
clear
or
confusing
?
A
s
written
,
this
does
N
O
T
meet
the
original
intent
of
what
I
proposed
to
solve
this
problem
.
T
his
is
a
placement
in
the
O
R
C
information
about
a
type
of
motion
that
can
be
filed
to
correct
an
existing
problem
.
I
suspect
that
this
was
assigned
to
C
henwei
Zhang
.
I
recognize
the
approach
that
she
takes
with
anything
involving
families
.
T
he
sections
and
cross
-
references
that
were
added
are
unnecessary
and
frivolous
.
T
his
is
one
of
several
simple
bills
that
she
has
turned
into
major
clusters
that
do
not
come
close
to
the
original
intent
.
S
he
overly
complicates
legislation
that
is
simple
and
to
the
point
.
I
t
used
to
be
that
members
of
the
L
S
C
were
randomly
selected
to
write
a
bill
for
a
legislator
. H
er
being
assigned
this
bill
,
the
two
from
C
reech
from
previous
sessions
,
S
B
1
74,
that
is
currently
in
the
S
enate
, HB
2
5
6
from
L
a
R
ae
and
Williams
,
and
a
bill
that
was
run
through
L
S
C
by
J
ohn
B
ecker
while
he
was
still
in
the
H
ouse
.
I
f
the
selection
was
random
,
I
need
to
buy
a
lottery
ticket
.
T
his
proposed
bill
is
a
first
for
the
nation
,
and
keeping
it
simple
will
be
key
to
passage
.
H
ave
it
put
back
to
what
I
sent
you
originally
.
I
f
she
claims
that
it
doesn’t
meet
L
S
C
writing
standards
(
she
has
made
that
claim
before
,
tell
her
I
want
the
writing
manual
.
T
he
existence
of
one
for
examination
is
referenced
in
both
the
O
hio
R
evised
C
ode
and
the
A
dministrative
C
ode
.